Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to Sri Lanka Journal of Aquatic Sciences are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to two or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.

Sri Lanka Journal of Aquatic Sciences operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that authors and reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, who is supported by an expert in the subject.

Section Policies

Appreciation

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Articles

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Review Papers

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Short Communications

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Technical Note

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Quick links